https://medium.com/basic-income/the-cost-of-universal-basic-income-is-the-net-transfer-amount-not-the-gross-price-tag-acb8aa5eab73 … And this: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/why-we-should-all-have-a-basic-income …
Great oped from @DrDaronAcemoglu on why Universal Basic Income is a rather poor idea, and a negative income tax a much better one
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-universal-basic-income-is-a-bad-idea-by-daron-acemoglu-2019-06?utm_source=Project+Syndicate+Newsletter&utm_campaign=f9eb26c403-sunday_newsletter_9_6_2019&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_73bad5b7d8-f9eb26c403-93562889&mc_cid=f9eb26c403&mc_eid=486921e978 …pic.twitter.com/uo48SP12nB
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
The cost of both Universal basic income and negative income tax is the same as the government would be clawing back the UBI payments from workers with income taxes, which could be a flat 20%, resulting in a large increase in tax revenue. Americans have a lot of loopholes now.
-
That would recover 20% of the expentiture. I think a flat tax is is a good idea, but it would not eliminate "loopholes." There would still needs to be rules for what constitutes income and costs that offset income.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Have you studied the New Jersey, U.S.A. experiment with a negative income tax? I know it was regarded as a failure and abandoned, but do no know details.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.