Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The US Climate Assessment says that while there is both increases and decreases in flooding, it is not possible to attribute flooding to human-induced climate change https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/8/ page 231pic.twitter.com/s5fq9iKRGh
Damages from US flooding, 1903-2018 have declined spectacularly, from around 0.5% of US GDP to less than 0.1% of GDP nowpic.twitter.com/gD0mPqjqHa
Maybe Al Gore and NPR owe us an apology for keeping scaring us silly?https://www.npr.org/2019/06/08/730456004/more-people-see-climate-change-in-record-floods-and-extreme-weather-will-that-me …
(Yes, climate is real, mostly human-made and a problem But it is *not* a crisis/catastrophe It will cost perhaps 2-4% of GDP by end of century, when our average income will be 300-500% of today's Here from Nobel climate economist Nordhaus https://www.nber.org/reporter/2017number3/nordhaus.html …)pic.twitter.com/pGmTlUhoDr
I like that you calculated this in %GDP. 
I usually see it shown in absolute dollars so inflation and wealth growth can be hidden and make the graph curve up instead of down.
Now there is more stuff to damage, so it’s easy to misrepresent weather damage with bad calculations
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
