Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It isn't absurd to question whether global warming will leave an unlivable world. It won't And then we're back in sane territory, to discuss costs and benefits of your proposal (I understand you'd like to avoid that, because it is soo expensive) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/06/it-is-absurd-question-whether-we-can-afford-keep-our-planet-liveable …
The UN Climate Panel found that the impacts of global warming if we do nothing is 2-4% of GDP by 2100 https://www.nber.org/reporter/2017number3/nordhaus.html …pic.twitter.com/pcCBrC7TJ7
This is just unbridled alarmism, which has been debunked many times before see e.g. https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1135949511149404160 …pic.twitter.com/0AfDRh9sFQ
After 30 years of Government work, I have learned not to trust any report by any side on any issue. The saying figures lie and liars figure is very true. I have reworded and presented data in different forms many times to appease the party in office.
Which unprecedented model was used? Up till now no model of IPCC was able to predict anything right. What has changed?
How much will US GDP have grown by then?
Hogwash
This is not a purely scientific exercise though. It merely applies a model of economic thought to science data using skewed measures based on certain values and assumptions. Happy to be corrected if I'm wrong!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
