"Innovating down the cost of energy" hasn't worked for sh)t with renewables. Forty years of subsidy after subsidy, innovation after innovation, and it is STILL not able to compete in the market. Didn't someone discuss doing the same thing and expecting different results? w.
“Climate emergency” talk neglects the fact that we need better and cheaper climate policies that can also work in China and India. This is about increasing investment in green R&D to innovate down the future cost of green energy... Learn more:http://ow.ly/l99C50uwXAy
-
-
-
The definition of insanity.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Nuclear. ‘Nuff said.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Yes, burn more natural gas and less coal. Cheap and cleaner. Yanks did it and brought down GHG production. The Don Quixote method does not work (yes windmills if you are not familiar!)
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Very true! If not, it’ll be like our “recycling” push of the past 2 decades where we only exported the problem abroad … and the plastics are floating in the garbage patches of the oceans today.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I referred to your sentence 'we need better and cheaper climate policies that can also work in China and India' in an article I just wrote about the foolish energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Thanks for your work!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.