Let’s be clear. Climate change is real, manmade and we need to tackle it. But do we need to present it as an apocalyptic crisis?
Read more in my latest for the @newyorkpost:http://ow.ly/MwVV50uwXhS
-
Bjorn many skeptics support most of what you have to say, but when it comes to stating “Climate Change is Man Made” I have to confess I’m at a loss as to how your interpretation of these changes leads you to that conclusion. What part of CC is from Man?https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1136292874838896642?s=21 …
Yes, I should write "climate change mostly man-made" meaning (IPCC) more than 50% of the temperature rise since 1950 is man-made. I find making this distinction lose people, who think "mostly manmade" is a loophole. I want to get to the cost and benefit of our policies
-
-
Where are the scientific evidence that 50% is due to human influence. This is only found in the IPCC models that are well-known for overvaluing the CO2 effects.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Whenever you have the time please take a look at this factual account of temperature adjustment... this is where to find the real “Man Made” Climate Change ..https://twitter.com/climaterealists/status/1116997974096326656?s=21 …
-
Peter Sandman’s model of risk communication is: Risk = Hazard + Outrage Proponents of an issue can amplify perceived risk in a population by actively working to induce more outrage, which is even easier with social media. https://www.psandman.com/index-OM.htm
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The 50% is an assumption and the IPCC can’t explain the significant 1910 to 1945 warming coincident with just 10ppmv rise in CO2.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
If that is the case, how would you explain the following 1800 : 240 PPM C02 2019 : 400 PPM C02 Increase of 66% Increase in 1C in average temperature on a 40C scale is 2.5% I would like to have your thinking over this Thank you
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Equal 40 years linear warming trends from 1904-1944 as from 1976-2016. How do IPCC "know" that more than 50% of the last one is "man made"? Or is it just the data that are man made?pic.twitter.com/oHzX8yddK8
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.