Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So I got it right then, there is only a very few peer-reviewed studies that you would call "alarmist." Thank you for that. Not sure how, considering the SR15 for example, you could conclude that death toll from AGW would be zero by 2100 (the year used in the paper).
Or this paper, https://www.pnas.org/content/111/9/3292 …, which found the cost of sea level rise could be $100 trillion+/year (10+% of GDP) — if nobody does anything With adaptation, the cost is 0.003% of GDP Everyone mentioned the $100+ trillion, not the lower figure
You are most kind to go the trouble. Thank you. I don't remember seeing many in the IPCC AR reports. Do you? In any case, how do you determine that the deaths from AGW will be zero by 2100 (the year in the first paper). That seems impossible by the info in the SR15.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
