Ah, how constructive: Climate alarmist: millions will die I point out the research showing: 1) none will die 2) very few will move And then PhD in chemistry joins —not with a substantial contribution (maybe challenging my points) but instead trying to disallow conversationhttps://twitter.com/GeraldKutney/status/1135634908263661568 …
-
-
Yes, this is classic alarmism: *17x* more die from cold than heat https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673614621140 … And here for the US (increasing cold deaths, decreasing heat deaths, despite global warming https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412017310346 …pic.twitter.com/FYKkuhQvhA
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
Also called co-pollutant. I don't want to return to this: "In 1800 the health conditions of our ancestors were such that 43% of the world's newborns died before their 5th birthday. These estimates are shown in the visualisation below." In 2015 global child mortality was 4.3%.
-
Population has gone from about 1 billion in 1860 to 7.7 billion now. The problem is GHG emissions and co-pollutants. My prescription: increase global availability of family planning services & girl's education funding & reduce combustion & CH4 leaks, etc. https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
and air pollution and carbon dioxide in air are not the same thing! Governments are pushing for a ban on carbon dioxide, while ignoring and doing nothing about air pollution which is actually killing people and other life on earth!
-
So, you have never heard of co-pollutants?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.