Unbridled climate alarmism: "But what about the many millions of people directly threatened, living in low-lying nations?" "They will die" Sorry, no: 1) Over 81 years, they will move, not die 2) Adaptation means almost none will move Unfounded terror scaring people needlesslyhttps://twitter.com/dwallacewells/status/1135373882356043778 …
-
-
But notice their reference for the 187 million (#38) Here is the paper. It says the following in the abstract: 187 million, but can be avoided by paying 0.02% of GDP Should reporters not be responsible for pointing this out, so people don't get so scared? https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2010.0291 …pic.twitter.com/DD4VGKONSx
Näytä tämä ketju -
Will adaptation happen — absolutely: Everyone will accept paying <0.02% to avoid >5% of GDP costs And then, instead of 187,000,000 displaced, you have less than 305,000 (at least 600x less) Shouldn't reporters be obliged to tell people that? Or okay to just scare them silly?pic.twitter.com/bFGqRBHRvN
Näytä tämä ketju -
Claim: Millions will die from rising seas Fact: They won't die, and almost none have to move The outcome of this climate alarmism porn is to frighten children and many adults needlessly How is such outrageous scare campaigning okay?
Näytä tämä ketju -
PS. I only analyzed first part of scare: 'many millions directly threatened: low-lying nations farmers affected by abrupt changes in weather, kids exposed to new diseases?” Others similar: 5.4 million kids die from entirely well-known, easily curable diseases, not new ones
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.