Siting, building and fueling 1 new nuclear reactor... A design with no operational or maintenance records No current regulatory or security framework No front end financial means of support No known decommissioning strategy ...a week for the next 50 years Sounds reasonable!
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
Of course. Elitism.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Bjorn cost of onshore wind below cost of gas before you even pay off the capital of a CCGT. Do the math.
-
Right, and it's the unreliability of wind that makes it so expensive. And then there's France and Germanypic.twitter.com/7zAqn8uTfm
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Exactly. The Green movement is a movement making out it is for the people when it is an imperialist-authoritarian party which does not give a damn about the financial impact on ordinary people or businesses.
-
That's because it's financed by wealthy fossil fuel interests which do not give a damn about the financial impact on ordinary people or businesses. The money is laundered through a charitable foundation or two, incidentally making their propaganda expenditures tax free.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Your thoughts on Tim Cook blaming Boomers for debating climate change.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It’s inhuman to deny the developing world of cheap energy
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Well Shellenberger is talking on his own account and dashing in for nuclear. But that is not going to save us: no time to waste! energy conservation and smart use is, now, tomorrow, future. And stopping subsidies for fossil is too
@350Europe@350@FossielvrijNL@klimaatVerandapic.twitter.com/O2urGuKkY4
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.