Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Carbon offsets (instead of CO₂ cuts, buy a forest somewhere) is terrible One project sold 48,000 credits to keep forests intact, but over 9 years forest area halved from 88% TO 46% https://features.propublica.org/brazil-carbon-offsets/inconvenient-truth-carbon-credits-dont-work-deforestation-redd-acre-cambodia/ …
As they say: Offsets are like the world’s most forgiving credit card: The buyer gets all the benefit upfront, while it takes a century for the full debt to be repaid https://features.propublica.org/brazil-carbon-offsets/inconvenient-truth-carbon-credits-dont-work-deforestation-redd-acre-cambodia/ …pic.twitter.com/P3kqx8GpXL
The British Columbia NDP seem to think it is valid. After scrubbing their page of actual co2 emissions they use it as an excuse to think they have lowered co2 emissions when in fact they have risen even after 12 years of taxing.
Norway has given USD 1bn the last 10 years to Brazilian forest projects. According to a Brazilian environmental minister they have probably been totally wasted.https://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/norge/2019/05/19/195579047/brasils-miljominister-norges-milliardbidrag-i-amazonas-fondet-er-bortkastet …
Carbon Credits sounds an awful lot like paying to "own a star" or "own a plot of land on the moon".
The solution is to harvest all the dead,down and diseased trees and transform them into Gas,oil and biochar through pyrolysis. So we have a measurable verifiable output of carbon sequestration. Plant millions of new trees in all of our Canadian forests, keep doing that forever
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
