Even with economic concerns seems significant to me...
-
-
-
With concern doubling since 2016...
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The category “environment” also includes a lot more than just climate change.
-
Exactly. I see no category "climate change" in the graph.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I don't get you, Bjorn. Are you pleased about this? You were wrong. Live long.
-
He is not happy, just a realist compared to all the sky is falling run for your life activists. He is all for reasonable action, such as not shutting down nuclear. He cares about cost versus effectiveness.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
They are distracted by
#feralCats; invented poison sausages they are dropping from planes. Seriously!Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
But if you ask them, what they want is an energy transition based on renewables, even if it costs a bit more. Which it won't given their great solar and wind resources and the eye-watering residnetial electricity prices in OZ today.pic.twitter.com/dumgvePfyJ
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Maybe they should care more. Their Great Barrier Reef went through some rough times in 2016-2017. That is irreplaceable. And any simple calculation of the # of hot days in various locations keeps increasing in Australia. It's their country, though, they can ignore it, I guess.pic.twitter.com/uw0y4gdyqD
-
Dude it grows back and quickly.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.