We're losing a million species in next decades" We heard it 40 years ago: "Civilization facing worldwide disaster"pic.twitter.com/Pk0Np15SAf
Näytä tämä ketju
-
And reading back, it is interesting to see the same mechanisms working again: 17 environmental organizations said the Global 2000 report "painted perhaps too bright a picture." Because it is always worse than you think (from Time Magazine, 8/4/1980pic.twitter.com/sYbzHZQcRe
Näytä tämä ketju
The report was wrong about species loss. We didn't lose 2 million species. We have till 2010 lost 872 documented species (this is certainly an underestimate, but not anywhere close to even 1% of the Global 2000 claim) https://www.iucnredlist.org/search pic.twitter.com/xRGJTcDv2Z
-
-
The report was wrong about species loss. It was also wrong on a lot of other points, like an impending oil crisis in the 1990spic.twitter.com/zoG9isKHyJ
Näytä tämä ketju -
And Global 2000 expected food prices to double by 2000 They instead declined by 67%...pic.twitter.com/gxLMxiHVvX
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
What’s your citation for the idea that the 2m figure was wrong? The 872 number is obviously a completely different metric.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.