Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
No, you don't get 32%, you get 5%: If everyone in the US went vegetarian, they would reduce emissions 316MtCO₂ or about 4.9% of US emissions The claim of 32% is only for *food* emissions, not total emissionshttps://twitter.com/muehlenbachs/status/1125529133545656320 …
US greenhouse gas emissions 6,456.7Mt CO₂ https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks … Reduction from study: 316Mt, from 985Mt to 669Mtpic.twitter.com/ViOPvU5tX2
And remember, the 4.9% will likely be reduced to about half, because vegetarian options are cheaper, and hence you have more to spend on other things (that emit CO₂, also known as rebound), seehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915002153?via%3Dihub …
This is evident in that the healthy diet *without* a budget constraint actually increases consumption and CO₂ emissionspic.twitter.com/aRf26eLEto
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
