Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Disaster cost in Australia 1966–2017 is not increasing (slightly but insignificantly decreasing), when corrected for more people and more valuable stuff https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1609406 …pic.twitter.com/hd9FR0wLvH
Of course, if you just look at the nominal cost of the disasters, it increases dramatically, and can be used to argue that catastrophes are getting worse But this neglects inflation and the fact that there are many more people with much more valuable stuffpic.twitter.com/0igIQsaz7x
This article shows that, properly accounted, the cost of weather-related disasters has *not* increased You can't claim that increasing damage costs are caused by global warming, because they disappear when correcting for development https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1609406 …pic.twitter.com/8KlKCDR8Of
Here is the normalized damage (adjusted for increasing population and more expensive houses etc.) for Australia 1966–2017, for hurricanes, the most expensive category https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1609406 …pic.twitter.com/VerWfrTWb6
Here is the normalized damage (adjusted for increasing population and more expensive houses etc.) for Australia 1966–2017, for storms https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1609406 …pic.twitter.com/IuQeeXGLpS
Here is the normalized damage (adjusted for increasing population and more expensive houses etc.) for Australia 1966–2017, for flooding https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1609406 …pic.twitter.com/4vt3jb96tR
It’s called “context”. Thank you, Prof., for supplying it in plenty.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
