Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Second, assembly only gets to discuss how to implement *your* goal? Really? Surely they also get to discuss how a net zero in 2025 not only impossible but attempting crazily costly? 80% reduction by 2050 cost >€1.2 trillion per year for EU, if done well https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2010007813400010 …
Third, you might want to be wary of asking real people what they want. They typically say, they care about climate, but only for about $100-200 a year, which is more than a couple of orders of magnitude away from what you're asking http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.003 … https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa822a …
Bjorn, my friend, you arguably, literally, have the largest silent majority backing of anyone who ever lived.
Like all good idealogues, they don’t realise they’re a noisy minority. They think everyone who is silent, or so far tolerates their antics, agrees with them.
Of course their "citizen assembly" would not in any way be duly elected and representative, would it?
Such a fool is this man. He knows the price of everything but the value of nothing.
Sir, if you feel he is in error, then refute his points. As a scientist you will have reviewed papers of your peers. Did your reviews ever accuse the authors of being fools?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
