The countries where wolves were increasing have few virgin forests left and already undergone many species going extinct and massive habitat loss, restricted to zoos or being farmed. Even our buffalo moved to Mexico. Just recently they’re starting to be reintroduced
Prosperity is often the answer:
@mattwridley in a great turn-of-phrase:
"Why are wolves increasing, lions decreasing and tigers now holding their own? Because wolves live in rich countries, lions in poor countries and tigers in middle-income countries."https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/climate-protests-the-sane-reaction-to-impending-catastrophe-or-a-costly-tantrum-sn0vwp5fs …
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
A study should look also on the effects of the needs of consumption of the rich countries affecting the poor ones: deforestation from intensive agriculture done by big companies, agressive mining, hunting industry driven by rich + corruption + poor legislation, etc.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
UK is 189 out of 218 countries as far as biodiversity. I don't think your example describes a valid correlation. Ihttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/19/manifesto-for-wildlife-uk-countryside-species-biodiversity
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
But evenly distributed prosperity, right? That's where as i see it the capitalist critique is warranted. Without checks on capitalism the growth won't go to the protection of the poorest from floods and hurricanes.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.