Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
"The 17 findings made by the university, the two speech directions, the five confidentiality directions, the no satire direction, the censure, the final censure and the termination of Ridd’s employment were all unlawful."https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/16/james-cook-university-professor-peter-ridds-sacking-ruled-unlawful?CMP=share_btn_tw …
Judge: “[The] university has ‘played the man and not the ball’” Remarkably, the university continues to claim: "we have not taken issue with Dr Ridd’s rights to academic freedom." and that he "was not sacked because of his scientific views" Right....
James Cook University may have already spent over $1 million in legal fees attempting to silence Peter. They had assumed that sooner or later he would run out of money and courage.https://www.spectator.com.au/2019/04/peter-ridd-has-defeated-the-climate-inquisition-thanks-to-you/ …
Indeed. Does he at least now have grounds for a lawsuit?
Uh.. then why was he there for so long, all the while expousing said scientific views? If you are so worried about scientific censorship did also you complain about defunding of science in Australia?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
