Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Moreover. I was not wrong on energy vs electricity. Far from it. It is a fact that electricity is only roughly 20% of the energy mix today. That ratio can and will be improved. If not the challenge to reduce GHG emissions will be collossal. As regards nuclear I beg to differ.
Anders, you can't seriously claim that you weren't wrong: "I was not wrong on energy vs electricity" I said solar & wind is 1% of global *energy* You declared me wrong because it is a different percent of electricity [really!] You were wrong — admit it and move on
You claimed for many years that solar and wind did only make up 1% of global energy. You may have been right in the beginning. But not now. Solar and wind make up 6-7% of global electricity - and electricity is 1/5 of the total. That is more than 1%. Furthermore - will continue
Drop it Anders, you’re making a fool of yourself, and more importantly you undermine your cause. Pls make sure you master the topic before attacking those who do.
If your base is primary energy demand, incl all the efficiency losses, solar and wind look small. But recognizing the efficiency of the electric engine, in tandem with solar and wind, and not suffering from inefficiencies in thermal plants the picture is totally different
Park life!
So stop badmouthing solar and wind. Btw, an issue you avoid is the need for deployment, learning curves and technology imrpovements. You sound as if there is a lab somewhere, we throw money on it and - all of a sudden - we have the perfect solution. Do you honestly believe that?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
