Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
#EnoughWithTheAlarmism
Alarmists annoyed that NYTimes don't blame global warming when writing about the flooding
This is ridiculous
Even US Climate Assessment "have not established a significant connection of increased riverine flooding to human-induced climate change"https://twitter.com/EndClimtSilence/status/1107737508207648770 …
Here is the quote from the US assessment, p161 https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/ pic.twitter.com/a4uzmOoyqF
The quote from the US Climate assessment on the science tells us that the UN Climate Panel couldn't find a connection to flooding magnitude, duration or frequency, p240 https://science2017.globalchange.gov/downloads/CSSR2017_FullReport.pdf …pic.twitter.com/C6clLk6hIN
And actually, the UN was even clearer: we're not even sure of the *sign* of flooding, i.e. whether there is more or less p214, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2017/09/WG1AR5_Chapter02_FINAL.pdf …pic.twitter.com/e5yhfdO68F
The linking of every catastrophe to climate is obviously very useful for alarmists: A 2019 survey showed that extreme weather makes more people change their minds on climate than anything else http://www.apnorc.org/projects/Pages/Is-the-Public-Willing-to-Pay-to-Help-Fix-Climate-Change-.aspx …pic.twitter.com/BMVZMCxUPM
But the alarmists are simply on the wrong side of the science when linking river flooding to climate
@RogerPielkeJr has called this "zombie science" — that claims of more flooding keeps coming back even if it has been debunked again and again
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2013/10/coverage-of-extreme-events-in-ipcc-ar5.html …pic.twitter.com/Zby2Xnq3nT
Dr. Guenter came back with an e-mail thread thin on evidence but rather heavy on derogatory adjectives (and depressingly, lauded by climate campaigners) Here are my more sober/relevant replieshttps://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1108354744878288897 …
You’re an idiot.
Selective, of course. May also want to read chapter 22. 'new and unprecedented variability that is likely to become more common in a warmer world.' Not being able to detect a signal amongst the noise yet does not mean there's no effect.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
