Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And unfortunately 60% of disaster losses are not reported, particularly in the most worse off countries. Making it hard to really know the impact of disasters.https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1106488236464107520 …
Kids striking for climate: "Worsening climate destruction"
No. Till today, because of human resilience, weather losses cost an ever smaller fraction of GDP
Contrary to what you hear, climate impacts are not getting worse
Unlikely that reporting was more complete in past, and currently miss more disasters If reporting is (more likely) better now (indicated by much higher degree of reporting on really small disasters) then it strengthens the argument
No doubt reporting in the past was less complete, but also less reliable. The argument itself isn't in question, it is that reporting is still so too poor to properly gage the financial impacts of disasters. Particularly since it doesn't include human capital or indirect cost.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
