Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Remember, the UN Climate Panel estimates the net impact of uninterrupted climate change by the end of the century to be equivalent to an income loss of 2-4% of GDP Here update from climate Nobel economist Nordhaus: Problem, not catastrophe https://www.nber.org/reporter/2017number3/nordhaus.html …pic.twitter.com/89UFjScKMC
Remember also that the UN Climate Panel estimated that the economic impacts of climate would be "small" compared to most other impacts from changes in "population, age, income, technology, relative prices, lifestyle, regulation, governance" etc. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap10_FINAL.pdf …pic.twitter.com/dTfpXYF6Tj
It is not just about avoiding scaring our kids (and ourselves) It is also about getting it right on helping the world: The more resources we spend badly on climate the fewer resources to spend well on climate and to spend on all the other issues that need our attention
Do they have it divided by country or region? Does it account for social/civil unrest due to displacement or water crisis?
For most economic sectors. Not much comfort as agriculture is the main worry.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
