Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
If climate change affects poorer countries in hotter regions more, how can a fossil fuelled scenario result in less inequality than a renewable one?
To reduce inequality globally, you need to lift dev'ing country people out of poverty. This is mostly done with lots of access to cheap, reliable energy In the fossil fuel driven scenario IPCC finds rich incomes x5, but poor incomes x23 (fix inequality)pic.twitter.com/DSMG5LySVj
Yes, poor countries are harder hit by global warming mainly bc lower resillience and more work outside, but getting rich avoids most of that We must always remember that climate has negative impacts, but so has climate policies. We should minimize their total, not just the firstpic.twitter.com/7nqaLEl7pa
Poor countries are hit harder by climate change because of their geography. So inequality would rise as poorer countries are hit by higher costs. It seems sensible to reduce the cost though climate policies, and help the poor pay for it by redistribution from the rich.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
