Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Some people just don't want to admit the obvious: A kWh that you can produce when it is needed is more valuable than a kWh which only can be produced when the sun is shininghttps://twitter.com/DrSimEvans/status/1098892262405214209 …
you mean the sun sets at night?!
Solar MWh are (or soon will be) cheaper than coal MWh.
Get over it. https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1098891392183648256 …This is why studies show that in California when solar penetration reaches 30%, a solar kWh will lose two-thirds of its value https://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy201636 …pic.twitter.com/0tgFOKTtcH
We have to ask people claiming "solar/wind is cheaper" why we then have to pay $129bn in subsidies? https://www.iea.org/weo2018/ Such claims are why ordinary citizens have paid a trillion dollars too much since 2007, and are on the hook for $4 trillion more till 2040pic.twitter.com/g76FPaPh3w
In Sweden we have hydropower, as baseload. How would you describe the impact of solar in the Swedish system?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
