Rather than forcing the rollout of currently inefficient green energy, governments should invest much more in research and development to make it cheaper for the future.
Read more in my latest for @ProSyn: http://ow.ly/7mqB50lNAsx
#climatechangepic.twitter.com/mPQEWJdPnW
-
Bjorn if you really wanted to be taken seriously you'd acknowledge the incredible cost reductions as wind, solar and lithium ion batteries have grown in scale. Your argument has been mugged by reality.
If solar&wind is cheaper, why must we pay them $129bn in subsidies?https://www.iea.org/weo2018/ No, claims of 'solar/wind cheaper' have mugged ordinary citizens, paying a trillion dollars too much since 2007, and on the hook for $4 trillion more till 2040pic.twitter.com/PtQFlhlQK3
-
-
Bjorn, solar & wind cheaper in new build situations in large section of globe. But we have to displace all the existing sunk investment fossil fuel plant. Not to mention the subsidies continuing to go to fossil fuels.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Also Bjorn my point is that deployment policies have proven to be incredibly effective in delivering large cost reductions that have got us to major tipping points. You ignore this with your R&D only simplistic policy prescription.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.