Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
But this is too good for Guardian, claiming it "couldn't be more wrong" 1) Argues $1.90 is silly, because people in the 1800s didn't need money "in order to live well" Really? Most people lived terrible, short lives just above subsistence minimum https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/29/bill-gates-davos-global-poverty-infographic-neoliberal …
2) Argues that higher poverty line of $7.40 shows # people increased dramatically since 1981: things getting worse Really? The percentage has declined from 71% to 58%, which means better And the author knows this: he wrote those numbers himself last year https://www.cgdev.org/blog/12-things-we-can-agree-about-global-poverty …pic.twitter.com/bCLL3SSH2L
Also hilarious to compare the absolute number of poor people, not the percentage, when the total world population has grown by 71% since 1981
They want to reverse the trend! agggh
This is what we call mainstream - or leftist junk journalism.
'most people' died in childhood pre industrial revolution
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
