Ah, the amazing point where you're called "denier" because you accept the problem but have the temerity of pointing out some policies just waste money I promote analysis of Nordhaus, who got the Nobel prize for figuring out which policies are smart and which just burn resourceshttps://twitter.com/DoctorVive/status/1090604398831718402 …
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
There's something "moral" about using your influence to discourage action as world faces existential crisis from
#climatechange?Lomberg continues to argue there are bigger issues - conveniently ignoring CC's role as driver against development. It's Sisyphean.
If you want to help the world, there is something moral about finding out where you can help most, first https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/post-2015-consensus …pic.twitter.com/074EHPFirV
-
-
This is old research against backdrop of
@IPCC 1.5 report. Why focus on tuberculosis or immunisation if the people you save will then die from extreme heat/cold, floods, & droughts, starvation instead? ... -
2ndly, am I to assume that trade can't include climate solutions? Or that energy, biodiversity, food security, women's economic security are not part of climate change agenda? Climate change adaptation shouldn't make economic sense: it's a humanitarian response to lack of action.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.