Ah, the amazing point where you're called "denier" because you accept the problem but have the temerity of pointing out some policies just waste money I promote analysis of Nordhaus, who got the Nobel prize for figuring out which policies are smart and which just burn resourceshttps://twitter.com/DoctorVive/status/1090604398831718402 …
-
-
So why not address health, jobs, clean water, energy, etc, through bold climate action? These are not binary choices.
-
Also, it might help to review some of the more recent analysis on investor perceptions of risks. I think you'll find that
#climatechange and extreme weather are now dominating narratives. Here you go! http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf ….pic.twitter.com/zhJ2dHRZDC
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
These are not uncorrolated.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The poll doesn't ask people what they want done first, or even what the most pressing issues are facing their community, country, world. It asks "which of these are most important for you and your family?"
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Since when the "majority" dictates the "morality"? With this logic, we couldn't have got rid of slavery, improve woman rights, gave animals some rights, ... Majority means nothing if they are uninformed. Plus, half of that list will be effected by climate change if we don't act..
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.