Carbon taxes are the true trickle down theory Govt is inherently the least efficient institution Whatever govt seizes thru taxation trickles down at pennies on the dollar
A globally coordinated, moderate and rising carbon tax could reduce temperatures modestly. This would cost about $20 trillion and avoid some climate-related harms, ensuring a net benefit of $30 trillion over coming centuries.https://nypost.com/2019/01/27/what-science-could-teach-ocastio-cortez-about-climate-change/ …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
So burn the planet down?
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Economists never include the cost of losing the Great Barrier Reef, or The Amazon. This is just a delay tactic.
-
Suggesting such a prospect is not reasonable.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Certainly. Fewer people means less carbon
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I worry the averaging of losses doesn't appreciate the distribution of losses, concentrated most in developing nations and vulnerable ecosystems. Regardless, the phrase, "The World Will End" is the environmental movement's equivalent of shooting itself in the foot.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
You lost me at "globally coordinated." We know how that always ends: loss of freedom. No thanks.
-
The biggest globally coordinated activity in history was the allied response in world war 2. That secured freedom throughout much of the world and restored it to vast regions that had fallen to dictators. So your axiom is actually bullshit
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.