Bjorn LomborgVarmennettu tili

All these comment think your piece supports those positions. If you do NOT think that your piece offers such support, I suggest you correct them. I am merely calling attention to the fact that they do interpret you in this way. 2/ fin.

You do not seem to realize I am not critiquing any argument of yours. I am stating what seems to be obvious: Those who deny the reality of climate change are taking your piece to be supporting their position. The evidence I offer is right before you in this comment thread. 1/

You have chosen to address me, but I am not the one making the claim that your piece supports them. THEY are. If they are wrong, tell THEM not me. If you disagree that climate science is a religion, if you disagree that @adambriggle is not a proto-fascist, if you disagree that 2/

You chose Twitter to make your initial comments, not me. This is your choice, not mine. My point, which you seem to refuse to understand, is to point out that it is an empirical fact that your post here has been taken to support those positions. This is simply true. 1/