Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Maybe Thunberg’s solutions aren’t the most realistic, but the position of Lomborg and his friends has basically evolved from “climate change doesn’t happen”, via “it’s exaggerated” to “fuck it, it’s too late and expensive to do anything about “.https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1089242104847585280 …
Pls don't misrepresent my points, I've fully agreed that global warming is mostly manmade since 1998, when I published my first Danish book. But I have consistently pointed out that we're not spending resources well
1998 was peak temperatures for this cycle
You’ve been a hero for the “climate sceptics” for decades and continue to be worshipped by the do-nothingists. You’re not really making any effort to shed that mantle. Every time you’re quoted on climate change it’s about someone wanting to do too much.
So what? Lomborg talks about logic, risk and priorities. He presents a balanced view, and he has been consistent. Damning him because some people may misuse or misinterpret what he says is a nothing argument.
Mine has also been consistent for over 20yrs. Small and mostly beneficial, which doesn't mean we shouldn't be studying it and trying to figure out the costs. It also doesn't mean we should be aggressively pursuing fossil fuels. There are plenty of other good reasons to diversify.
Bjorn, you might agree that #Climatechange is mostly man made but you seem to consistently oppose any action to address it, arguing that we should be doing something else. #Climatechange deniers find your criticism very useful.
To a casual observer, ‘scientists’ who struggle with logic and prefer misrepresentation and ad hominem attacks appear petty and unconvincing.
Bjorn - you really should spend some time looking at some climate history, and you would realise it is not just the climate change economics which is bollocks.pic.twitter.com/QDMy3VeBa6
If we could generate a baseline for Mr Lomborgs AGW standpoint... it would be beneficial to demand he links the dataset that clearly shows to what FACTOR human activity contributes to the warming... and could we avoid idiocy like “mostly manmade” that’s a political statement!!!
And thank God! An academic who thinks rationally. So rare. So rare.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
