Why is the World Economic Forum taking climate advice from a 16 year old climate campaigner instead of the world’s only Nobel climate economist?pic.twitter.com/44FQmDb1dd
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And can provide100% guarantee on this statement for future generations?
Can you provide 100% guarantee that the current climate models are 100% accurate?
What price do they assign to the Great Barrier Reef? The Marshall Islands? The Marshalees’ culture? The Everglades? How about Venice? What’s the price of a unique place like Venice?
3.5 degrees will mean for certain the compete and irreversible melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet.
"3.5°C will be a problem, not a disaster.' You are a weirdo like all the other deniers fueled by pseudoscience, sorry not sorry.
Bjorn please tell me how many people will die bc of 3.5C and how that's not a problem? Not a problem for you or for them?
How can you even attempt to put a cost on the 50% of the Great Barrier Reef that has already died because of +1C warming? No models needed, just measurements. Tell me how much cost is in your calculation please.
Are you really talking about costs and benefits? The only choice is little effort now and extinction later, or big efforts now and maybe survival. If this efforts are what you call "costs" ok. And we have no benefit to expect, just not destroying the conditions of life
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.