Why is the World Economic Forum taking climate advice from a 16 year old climate campaigner instead of the world’s only Nobel climate economist?pic.twitter.com/44FQmDb1dd
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Perhaps if people had the proper education, action on climate change would be at the top.
Basicaly youre saying ppl are stupid because climate change are not their priority
Looking at the data, Bjorn, it seems that 50% of the votes came from two countries, Mexico and Nigeria, and even those totals are a fraction of the populations of these two nations. How is this poll dispositive of what the people of this planet want?
Agreed. But polls do tend to work that way in general. In fact, loads of theories are put out as "proven" on the basis of a survey of 40 college students.
I might just add this graph to my slides when I teach about the challenges of climate cooperation in 2 weeks. Quite straight to the point... thanks!
Carbon output is only going to grow with China & India, along with most of the Third World, growing economically as they are. Like it or not, that's the truth. Best we invest in fusion and clean nuclear plants (possible in concept) & mitigating any adverse effects.
no, obviously.
That's not why they asked.
No need to argue, central banks have it covered. They are presently engineering the largest decrease in energy consumption the world has ever seen.
You need climate action for health and likely jobs and education will solve the rest of issues. People are smart.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.