"...two effects range from 97 to 301 billion 2014 dollars per year (0.09 - 0.28% of current world GDP). We argue that aquaculture output would not be reduced, due to the high potential for adaptation by this young industry." Which means complete loss of corals is no big deal?
-
you can see the short version here as my TED talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU-LTKOJY9M … (or you can read the Cambridge University Press book)
Here are the costs in 2019 lack of health costs 9% of GDP (we would be 9% richer, if all had good health) lack nutrition, education and gender inequality costs about 6% eachpic.twitter.com/USydBCuGUh
-
-
Global warming is right now a *benefit* (because global warming causes more heatwaves, but also fewer coldwaves, leading to *fewer* total deaths) This is a "sunk benefit" - we would get this no matter what Damages will increase in future, so climate policy still makes sense
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.