Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
.@jordanbpeterson I just listened to your discussion w @BjornLomborg the “skeptical environmentalist.” Very flawed logic. Costs imposed by climate change are systemic+permanent (we pay them every year for rest of history). And no discussion of value of biodiversity or ecosystems.
Thanks for your comment. You might also be interested to know that the growth costs from climate policies are similarly permanent costs (theyput us on a slightly lower growth trajectory which means every year we are slightly less rich than we would otherwise have been).
Thanks for your response. That’s an interesting point, though I think it assumes you understand more about the future and economic growth than in reality you do. Could you please direct me to where I can find your complete methodology?
(copied from my wall) 1/2 So @BjornLomborg do you actually believe you can accurately predict economic growth 100 years into the future? I'm all for modeling -- it's useful. But given tech, social and political discontinuities, I think you put too much stock in your assumptions.
2/2 Also, @BjornLomborg could you share methodology for valuing a stable climate, healthy ecosystems and biodiversity? It always seems like your discussions leave out the "point of no return" problem. Once we break certain climactic systems, we can't fix them. Same 4 extinctions
This is critical because wealth growth is exponential and the eradication of poverty is the single most important policy tool to tackle climate change.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
