So much for rising inequality in the modern era.
Wealth in the UK: Top 1% owned 70% just before WWI https://promarket.org/inequality-imperialism-first-world-war/ …pic.twitter.com/qPI8KUwTJH
-
-
-
It is, just not to the levels of the past. A key distinction that this illustrates.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Interesting: The picture you get from MSM is otherwize that the trend is the opposite: Wealth is being focused to fewer and fewer people. Is the data you show here typical for western nations or does the UK stick out in this respect?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
The income tax anendment.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Should remember though many villages and towns ruled by one estate that employed everyone in village - the low level workers had nice houses that cost half a million today , yet they didn't have any 'wealth', but a steady comfortable lifestyle
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Also of course in many cases it's a different one percent (family). Mathematically there will always be a one percent. But it's different people!
-
Would be interesting to see what percentage of the nations assets various dynasties have owned over time.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
This explains why we have England to thank for Karl Marx’s account of capitalism.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.