"Electric cars" is the answer to the question: What is the most expensive way to cut a tonne of CO₂ according to just-published research? https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.32.4.53 …pic.twitter.com/xEx1Jpn1WB
Näytä tämä ketju
-
That’s not what that says at all...
If you read what it says, you'll see that it is. As the article says: it is a systematic review of costs of interventions aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, with costs in 2017$ per ton of CO₂e avoidedpic.twitter.com/Eaz9MdvGuX
-
-
Whey is right in the pedantic sense that you can always imagine a less efficient way to do something if you really try, or the less-pedantic sense that the table is sorted by best-case estimate; some of the worst-case estimates are far worse than electric cars.
-
What I’m saying is that this study is about the efficiency of various government interventions. With respect to electric cars, it’s studying the static efficiency of specific subsidy programs (the argument for which is never about static effect), not of electric cars writ large.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Why do you think costs of various government interventions per ton of CO2 reduction could even determine electric cars are the most expensive way to reduce CO2? “Electric Cars” are a thing, not a government intervention.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.