thanks to @Whey_standard, this perhaps needs a clarification:
It is "the current policy of subsidies for electric cars" that is the most expensive way to cut a tonne of CO₂e
Näytä tämä ketju
"Electric cars" is the answer to the question: What is the most expensive way to cut a tonne of CO₂ according to just-published research? https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.32.4.53 …pic.twitter.com/xEx1Jpn1WB
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Where would hydrogen powered vehicles rank on this study?
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Who cares? They're expensive now. We're in the very very infancy stage of batteries.. At one point, the price will come much further down as it gets more popular, just a 50 inch TV used to be 5k now it's 500 bucks.
-
Yes. Most every other new product gets its start by having early adopters pay too much, paving the way for it to become cheaper for the masses. Why does Bjorn think electric cars have to be cheaper than IC on day one?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The myths of EV's and Global Warming are about to go down in flames together (pun intended).
-
This is about subsidy costs. Not about the efficacy.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That’s not what that says at all...
-
If you read what it says, you'll see that it is. As the article says: it is a systematic review of costs of interventions aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, with costs in 2017$ per ton of CO₂e avoidedpic.twitter.com/Eaz9MdvGuX
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Good to know. That confirms what
@VaclavSmil claims in his books and lectures for long time. -
Could you expand a bit what you mean? The main thesis.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.