Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Dear @GeorgeMonbiot, I saw you tweeted this. I thought you might be interested in my reply.
It surprised *me* that going vegetarian doesn’t have a bigger impact.
https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1058333362325196800 …https://twitter.com/GeorgeMonbiot/status/1057334853463666688 …
@GeorgeMonbiot In Sweden, a new study shows that going vegetarian (after "rebound") will reduce emissions by 2.1%
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915002153 …pic.twitter.com/UQbFPDr0S2
For industrialized world, biggest meta-study show 540kgCO₂e reduction (4.35% all emissions, 20-35% diet emissions). Bc vegetarian cheaper, more money spent on other stuff, more emissions, 50% of reduction lost (“rebound”)), leading to ~2% https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652614012931 …pic.twitter.com/M9vOkYGLGk
The argument is that with all the money saved from eating less meat, the consumer will spend the money on other goods instead?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
