No, you're not advocating a carbon tax, but a prohibition: "If the [carbon] tax doesn’t stop us from burning fossil fuels, then it’s not high enough."https://twitter.com/JonathanWich/status/1057746755251515393 …
-
I don't see what aspect of a carbon tax, or even a prohibition, you're opposed to. Are you suggesting it can't help curb behavior? Or something else? Just saying "prohibition" seems to compare it to American Prohibition, which seems markedly dissimilar.
An efficient carbon tax will cut some but not all emissions, because some emissions less valuable than damages from CO₂, many more valuable (as in Nordhaus' optimal path (https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170046 …)) Claiming carbon tax should stop fossil fuels miss point of such taxpic.twitter.com/KrlKIuDMsh
