I don't see what aspect of a carbon tax, or even a prohibition, you're opposed to. Are you suggesting it can't help curb behavior? Or something else? Just saying "prohibition" seems to compare it to American Prohibition, which seems markedly dissimilar.
No, you're not advocating a carbon tax, but a prohibition: "If the [carbon] tax doesn’t stop us from burning fossil fuels, then it’s not high enough."https://twitter.com/JonathanWich/status/1057746755251515393 …
-
-
-
An efficient carbon tax will cut some but not all emissions, because some emissions less valuable than damages from CO₂, many more valuable (as in Nordhaus' optimal path (https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170046 …)) Claiming carbon tax should stop fossil fuels miss point of such taxpic.twitter.com/KrlKIuDMsh
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Selling carbon credits is the financial angle many are planning to profit from. Huge incentive to regulate carbon even if it doesn’t fix anything
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.