A key tactic used by @BjornLomborg to mislead people is to focus on one particular way of reducing emissions, such as wind power or vegetarianism, and try to dismiss it because alone it does not stop all emissions.
Discount rate is Nobel Laureate Nordhaus' (sliding 2-4%, not 7%)
I said high-latitude countries benefit from mildly higher temps (uncontroversial, e.g. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/29/climate/southern-states-worse-climate-effects.html …)
0.2-2% (not just 0.2%) cost is IPCCs (as I emphasized and showed on slide)
#youlearnmoreifyoulisten
