Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Now I see. Your figure is entirely yours and does not appear in the paper. You assume meat consumption only occurs in OECD countries and exclude countries such as China and Brazil. Nice try.
The benefits of understanding before tweeting: I don't "assume meat consumption only occurs in OECD" (what a strange idea). The figure of 540kg CO₂e *is* from the paper. I show that means 4.3% for rich countries, in line with Swedish study
You are tying yourself up in knots. The 540kg figure is the average cited in the paper from 7 studies of northern European countries and India. But you assume the denominator should be average per capita production emissions for all OECD countries of 12.7 tonnes. Not legitimate.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
