Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And Table 1 shows that the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions for a vegetarian diet is 20-35%. Show your working if you think the reduction is only 4.3%.
Bob, you have to read what the table says: It is 20-35% *of GHG emissions from the diet* equivalent to 4.3% of a person's total emissions (if you had read my tweet, the calculation was there for you to understand: 540kgCO₂e/yr, 12.5t CO₂e for OECD = 4.3%)pic.twitter.com/5ObqlCcIFP
No, the table does not cite a figure for a person's total emissions. You have made up the 4.3% figure and pretended it appears in the paper.
Now I see. Your figure is entirely yours and does not appear in the paper. You assume meat consumption only occurs in OECD countries and exclude countries such as China and Brazil. Nice try.
The benefits of understanding before tweeting: I don't "assume meat consumption only occurs in OECD" (what a strange idea). The figure of 540kg CO₂e *is* from the paper. I show that means 4.3% for rich countries, in line with Swedish study
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
