No, Bob, "diet excluding animal products" is vegan, not vegetarian (would be so cool, if Bob could be less contemptuous and more correct – oh well)https://twitter.com/ret_ward/status/1054054664717721600 …
-
So you object to an article about greenhouse gas reductions from cutting meat from the diet but you want to exclude vegans? You point to one study that excludes impacts of land use change, etc. but you think I need to be more correct?
Bob, honestly: I write about vegetarian, you chide me for not quoting another study, that doesn't look at vegetarian. I point this out, you claim I'm wrong, turns out you're wrong, and now you claim I'm trying to exclude vegan? Can't make this up
-
-
Your chicanery may fool climate change 'sceptics'. You point to one study on vegetarianism to argue against the benefits of reducing meat consumption, but exclude vegans. I point out it does not include land use change. So you cite another study, but misrepresent its results.
-
i point to study and metastudy that vegetarian reduce total emissions about 4% before rebound (and about 2% after). I even show that your study seems to indicate about same numbers as the metastudy for vegans, so confirming my point
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.