Silly: 238 academics claim we need to embrace no-growth economies, because of environmental limits and declining productivity gains This is incorrect, as is their claim that degrowth can improve our quality of life https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/16/the-eu-needs-a-stability-and-wellbeing-pact-not-more-growth …
-
-
They claim declining productivity could lead to no growth in Europe within a decade. Maybe we should try to fix that with better education and regulation?
Näytä tämä ketju -
The claim that no-growth or de-growth would be good for us is simply wrong. Both within and between countries, life satisfaction *increases* with higher income http://www.sole-jole.org/12513.pdf Published here: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.103.3.598 …pic.twitter.com/Iocu7AgShq
Näytä tämä ketju -
The claim that no-growth or de-growth would be good for us is simply wrong. 4 of 6 good life indicators increase with higher incomes https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X15307117?via%3Dihub …pic.twitter.com/NxC6pviwt4
Näytä tämä ketju -
Oh, and all of these researchers will fly to Bruxelles with their laptops to tell the rest of us we need to cut back on flights and luxuries like laptops. Hypocrisy, much?
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Lol, because you can afford to outsource your deforestation... Imported food, wood, coffee etc. Looking at issues with bias can make you conclude whatever you want.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.