Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Thanks, @FrancoisF24, for an interesting debate. Surprisingly, some seemed to resist inconvenient facts, so let me just outline what seemed to be the most controversial ones @rajendrashende, @MohamedNasheed, @hblandeshttps://twitter.com/F24Debate/status/1040269890572230656 …
Solar and wind is not cheaper, and according to the International Energy Agency, they will still be the most expensive option both in the OECD and the rest of the world by 2040, *even* with a carbon tax. Yes, inconvenient, but yes, also important to hear https://www.facebook.com/bjornlomborg/photos/a.221758208967/10156696515988968/?type=3&theater …pic.twitter.com/nFFp5uXmBw
IEA has been - and continues to be - hilariously wrong about both renewables and electric cars. Bloomberg/BNEF does a far more realistic projection for future costings and usage. Their "New Energy Outlook" report came out earlier this year, and is worth a read.
Oh yeah - because Bloomberg predictions are Soooo accurate?? Perhaps reality might be different from your desire to believe?pic.twitter.com/nKUtsb3Yc5
What is the cost of capital used for each of these? And is it constant? And should it be constant? As an investor, I'd be much happier lending to a solar farm with a low CoC than nuclear, where there is a small - but real - chance of disaster.
Then you are silly - Solar farms have a lifetime <1/3 that of a nuclear plant and you clearly have no idea of the actual risk profilepic.twitter.com/xKTShgA288
People need to expand their search for facts about this boondoggle. https://stopthesethings.com/2018/09/03/blackout-nation-chaotic-delivery-of-wind-solar-causing-blackouts-wrecking-australias-power-grid/ …
But there are more efficiently designed wind mill available
And yet, the original paper *still advocates a carbon tax because the negative long term effects of climate change outweigh any positive effects. It's *not advocating that everybody just keep using fossil fuels.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
