Aside from the immorality of obliging poor nations to avoid policies that would reduce poverty, the big problem with forcing carbon cuts is that green energy is not yet the savior that it is portrayed as.
More in my latest for @nypost:http://ow.ly/N8RE30lA98j
-
Ok, so GDP resets $600B lower and assumes a similar growth trajectory thus each year GDP is $600B less than it otherwise would have been. That makes sense now. Thanks for the clarification Bjorn.
great, yes. And it is just that the GDP grows slightly slower each year, so by 2030, it is 1.6% behind in the most efficient policy scenario (and then, with no more policies, it will stay 1.6% behind every year from then)
