Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I like how you ignore that this data pretty clearly appears to show an uptick in recent years (likely due to climate change) and that the massive drop is almost certainly from improved fire fighting techniques. Your dishonesty on this makes your think tank seem untrustworthy...
Perhaps read my linked post first? I did write it is also going up, I did write the reasons (more burnable mass) and that global warming likely will increase burning, but also returning to the massive, overwhelming point from the graph: that wildfire used to be much worsepic.twitter.com/YrWM9zqSpW
Then, at best, you appear to be trying to distract from the actual issue at hand. They were worse in the past due to lack of firefighting techniques. You're just seemingly pointlessly downplaying the uptick in wildfires because it was worse at some point in the past.
The 1918 flu killed 50-100 million people - that doesn't mean that other unusually bad flus that kill fewer than 50 million people should be something we aren't concerned about.
They never read your posts. They assume they know what you’ve said from your tweet.
If you heavily imply something in your headline/tweet, then have a minor caveat in your post where you admit that the basis of your headline/tweet is wrong -- then at best you're being intentionally misleading -- and quite possibly maliciously so.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
