I can understand why the anti-billionaire-shakedown people seem like monsters if your starting point is that liquidating one middle-ranking plutocrat could give everyone a life-changing amount of money.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bad take
-
Could you elaborate?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
356 RTs later is a good place to spot "rdon't"
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those aren’t any two people though. They are part of elite media institutions that have a reputation of factiness & condescend other peoples mistakes via things like fact checking.
-
When I was a child, I saw a celebrity Jeopardy tournament. I saw that many of the smartest sounding talking heads knew nothing.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
exactly. they WANTED it to be true. she said "it's disgusting". She had her presuppositions and didn't do the most basic of calculation to see if her view mapped on to reality. These are largely the ppl who support bernie / democratic socialism.
-
The story, as they say, was too good to check.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Empirical studies consistently find that people significantly underestimate the extent of inequality, and that correcting these perceptions tends to increase support for redistribution on average https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/Hauser%20%20Norton%20(2017)_5b0d07bb-f8d6-4edc-bddc-434ef6cd930e.pdf …
-
This empirical study indicated that wealth inequality may be a very natural byproduct of a wide spectrum of innumeracy
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.