Billare

@Billare

Various sciences & conservative politics. Consumer, not a producer.

Joined May 2007

Tweets

You blocked @Billare

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @Billare

  1. Pinned Tweet
    25 Nov 2016

    I use Twitter differently than most; a way of puzzling through in words reactions to things I read. Often, I'm not really talking to anyone.

    Undo
  2. Oct 17

    the American lives protected by the the counter-terrorist intelligence the Kingdom shares. Remarkably Trump seems more rational, more thoughtful, less histrionic on this than many of those who judge him daily.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Oct 17

    because Trump seems to have a larger moral universe under consideration than the various outraged pundits, who care about their journalist class, but not say the soldiers lives who protect the Kingdom, the workers who produce arms that the Kingdom buys..

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Oct 17

    but when a Saudi national dies on Saudi soil then it overflows, because he wrote for the Post, seems to have had extensive Beltway connections. I am not often a fan of Trump, but I will say I am a fan of his flavor of reasoning talking about the decision he will make..

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Oct 17

    Is no one else bothered by the fact that important foreign policy decisions seem to rest on the pivot of a single remarkably well-liked man? Outrage from our political class was not forthcoming when we commit men & materiel to the proxy war in Yemen...

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Oct 17

    So an 30% chance that perhaps some strongly Native American ancestor didn’t have their DNA show up in Warren. Or that ancestor could have been European White, and made no difference to the estimate. Probably comparing lengths of longest matching runs more error-free comparisons

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Oct 17

    because recombining segments are stochastically lost over time. But read the chart; simulations indicate at generation 6 transmission is nearly guarantee at 100%; at generation 10 it’s 30%. Taking the median there is a 100 - 70% = 30% chance the inferred % is an underestimate.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Oct 17

    I don’t think the overall tweetstorm this came from is good, because it shades the critical points it is trying to make by being indirect vs. insinuating. Here, I think this is trying to suggest that Warren’s inferred Native ancestry could be an underestimate of the true figure

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Oct 16

    while the whiter members are interested in protecting Warren from Nasty Man Trump and proving Rs just don’t get science as usual.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Oct 16

    It is so strange to find candid interrogation of an issue in the media when the Democrat is facing the fire. My hypothesis is this possible only because there is an actual split in the coalition: The “PoC” are deeply interested in policing their exclusivist claims to identity..

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Oct 16

    This is incredible. It gets straight to the heart of the matter about what the problem was with Warren’s claim.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Oct 16
    Replying to

    Warren did, in fact, claim that her grandfather forced her parents to elope because he was so racist against her mother's Cherokee background. Given the DNA test, it's pretty absurd.

    Undo
  13. Oct 16

    No one ever claimed or contended Warren was an official member of some tribe. We all understand that cultural affinity differs from heredity. The contention is whether it was tendentious for her to claim that ethnicity at her time at HLS and an explanation for her choice.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Oct 16

    So I was skeptical of the pro-Elizabeth Warren “fact-check” articles, which do the usual thing of correct claims that were never asserted, provide ultra-charitable explanations of the contentious issues... ...

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Oct 13
    Undo
  16. Oct 10
    Undo
  17. Oct 10

    And despite that, an often copious amount of expected housework and child raising, many of these women must have had to just “got on” despite undergoing these experiences. They couldn’t afford long psychological traumas or deviating from their societal expectations.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Oct 10

    Related to that is these rates were very high in the past. Unfathomably high. It was a consisted a *routine* spoil of war. Violent crime rates were much higher in the past, so your average woman had a much higher risk of being murdered, assault, burgled or raped than today.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Oct 10

    Basically, many of these stories ask us to believe women are incompetent or helpless custodians of themselves. They weren’t, as much as they were afforded in societies in the past, so I don’t see reason to credit such stories in the present.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Oct 10

    Women in the past would not have had the space, usually, to do bizarre things like voluntarily endanger themselves of the most precious commodities they possessed, not call in the most immediate law and justice in a time when it uncertain it could be had.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Oct 10

    The breadwinner gets killed in a raid. Or a woman gets raped. All serious tragedies, that they had to be prepared to face and deal with far more quickly today. Even evolutionary adaptations, like lubricating when forced. Or cultural ones, like calling one’s male relatives.

    Show this thread
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·